Free BRINKS Prepaid Mastercard Bonus

Free Brink's Prepaid Mastercard Bonus:

'via Blog this'

LIGHTING THE NEAR EAST DYNAMITE BOX: Friedman and His Fanatic Islamic Counterparts

LIGHTING THE NEAR EAST DYNAMITE BOX:  Friedman and His Fanatic Islamic Counterparts

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(There are occasions when extreme journalism is necessary to impart urgency.  This is one of those situations.)

THE APPOINTMENT OF David Friedman as US Ambassador to Israel is a disgrace and a spit upon international law and the world community.

Friedman is an augmented tendril of the Netanyahu Third Reich government established by Netanyahu's ultra conservative group.

These are fanatical people who have a callous disregard for international law, the UN Charter, UN Resolutions, Law of War on Land (1907) and the post Napoleonic Era prohibiting one country's acquisition of land by annexation of another country's territory.

Friedman, like Netanyahu's ultra fascists, subscribes to the belief that Eretz Israel has a "biblical right" to all of Jerusalem and all of Palestine.

These are people who are cut of the same cloth of ISIS / IS. They are driven by religious fanaticism, in derogation of law. Like the warped heads of Islamic terrorists who believe Islam is destined to be the theological power in the world, so too are these Judaic fanatics who believe that their theology is destined to disrupt a world governed by laws.

These are equally sick, fanatical Islamic and Judaic religious drunks.

There is an unquestionable legal status of Jerusalem, that undermines the warped fanaticism of religious drunks like Friedman, who believe that G-d instructs them to conquer and steal, the same way that ISL fanatics are driven to biblical beheadings.

They are no different.

The UN in 1947 partitioned Palestine under the UN Resolution for the Partition of Palestine 1947. At that time, after Palestine was destabilized by terrorist groups, like the IRGUN murderers headed by Menachim Begin, who blew up the King David Hotel, murdering British officers and other innocents, the Zionist Political Party was given 78% of Palestine to establish the state of Israel.

Israel declared independence in 1948. The legitimacy of Israel arises from recognition and creation by UN Resolution. The legitimacy of Israel does not arise from warped, religious notions of theological supremacy.

That Partition Plan granted West Jerusalem to the Zionist Party, while East (Old) Jerusalem remained within the proper state of Palestine. Old Jerusalem was NOT included in the UN Partition Plan which created Israel. It remains, under all applicable laws, a part of Palestine.

Neither the 1967 Arab-Israeli War or any subsequent action has conferred Israel any sovereignty over East Jerusalem. No laws or actions have granted Israel any greater right over those areas in which Israel continues its invasion of Palestine, through construction of housing units for Israelis, than the rights limited to Israel's boundaries created in 1947.

Under the Geneva Convention provisions, custom and protocols, Israel is a "Foreign Military Occupying Power" in East Jerusalem.

Nothing has changed that international law and legal status of Jerusalem. This legal status has not changed, despite the massive disinformation campaign to portray Jerusalem as some area of land that is "up for grabs" by two competing parties.

East Jerusalem was never a part of the land partitioned off from Palestine, that was given to the Zionist Political Party. 

This is not an argument. This is a legal fact.

An "Occupying Power" under the Geneva Convention has nothing to negotiate. The Israeli Occupying Power in East Jerusalem and throughout the territories of Palestine is simply under a legal obligation to withdraw from all occupying territories, belonging to Palestine.

Borders of a country do not change, because one newly created country has been given billions in military arms, to exercise threat over another established indigenous people and their country.

David Friedman is a religious drunk. He is the mirror image of the Islamic terrorists who find joy in cutting off the heads of others who refuse to believe in their sick interpretation of a god.

If David Friedman's nomination is approved, it will be the US' striking a match and putting its face close to light the Near East dynamite box.

(c)oliver2016

NOW BROADCASTING: Diversion and Deception Techniques In Identifying The Cyber Attack Government

NOW BROADCASTING: Diversion and Deception Techniques In Identifying The Cyber Attack Government
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

LISTEN TO ME here...

These people on the radio who are saying Russia conducted the cyber attacks, because "Putin was in the KGB. He takes a special interest in these types of things..." are spreading nonsense.

There is NO significant history of espionage against the US by Russia. There is a long list history of espionage and unsurpassed cyber war capability by Israel.

Russia stood to gain nothing by the election of either Donald Trump or Hillary Clinton.  On the other hand, Israel is poised to accomplish self-perceived historic gains, by the election of Donald Trump, through the appearance of US legitimacy to Israel's claim to Jerusalem and all of Palestine.

The last US major espionage conviction involving Russia was in the middle 1970s, in which a confused and mislead CIA employee sold top secret documents to Russian agents at an overseas Russian Embassy.

In contrast, Israel has engaged in a continuing comprehensive espionage program against the US for the past 40 plus years.  Israel's Mossad has been comprehensively active with espionage and theft in the areas of Scientific, Industrial, Political, Academic and Military intelligence.  This includes the theft of  US intellectual property and university research data.  

The history and propensity of Israel's espionage activity against the US is clear. 

Israel hijacked a tractor trailer along Route 80 in Pennsylvania, which was transporting weapons grade Plutonium.  Mossad smuggled the Plutonium out of the US to launch Israel's illegal nuclear weapons program at, below and in proximity of the Dimona reactor.  Israel has since manufactured more than 250 illegal nuclear warheads. 

Israel's Mossad agent Jonathan Pollard was sentenced to the longest prison term in modern US history for causing, as termed by the federal sentencing judge, "the greatest damage to US National Security in history."

Israel stole research data from one the US' largest chemical companies in order to further their military top secret program on "Smoke."

In another instance, Israel's young married Research Professor was "handled" by Mossad to steal research data from a large Eastern public University in the area of "Ceramics."  That young research scientist and his wife was arranged to meet his Mossad contact near the border of Connecticut and Rhode Island at a remote lake in a State Park Reserve.  This Mossad contact was conducted during a weekend mathematics conference held at Yale University. 

Israel's Embassy in the District routinely stole copies of legislative materials being transported for publication before those documents could make it across the street from the US Capitol Building to the Government Printing Office.

The list of espionage against the United States by Israel is long and continues.

Israel's motive in hacking the US national elections is based on Trump's earlier promise to illegally deliver East Jerusalem to the Netanyahu government, by legitimizing Netanyahu's plan to annex all of Palestine, beginning with moving the US Embassy to Jerusalem.

Netanyahu, who clandestinely implemented a genocidal African Baby Program, by secretly inoculating all African women entering Israel with the long-lasting contraceptive, Depo Provera, gleefully described his successes as, "Trump is a true friend of Israel."  Netanyahu immediately announced "the end to the two state solution."  

Neither Netanyahu or Israel has demonstrated any restraint in their actions against the United States or other countries, when a goal is deemed in Israel's greatest interests.

Trump has now promised to act quickly on his pre-campaign promise to Netanyahu that the US will move its embassy to Palestine's East Jerusalem.   

No country in the world recognizes Israel's claim that Jerusalem is its capital.  No country in the world will locate its embassy to Jerusalem and thereby legitimize the illegal appropriation of Palestinian Lands, pursuant to the UN Charter, the UN Resolution for the Partition of Palestine 1947 and numerous provisions and resolutions under international law. 

Despite this world community interpretation of international law, Netanyahu's goal to exterminate all of Palestine sovereignty was facilitated with  the election of Donald Trump.

The Israeli unsurpassed cyber war capability presented no difficulty in accomplishing that Holy Grail acquisition, through the hacking of US voter registration rolls to ensure Trump's election. 

Additionally, this nonsense about the CIA concluding that it was Russia and Putin behind the
cyber attacks is beyond the heads of these mouthpieces on the radio.

Take note: The CIA is PROHIBITED by Charter and federal law from conducting any examinations
or investigations within the United States. The Agency is also the least competent of US intelligence gathering agencies. Even in analyzing international locus points of interest, the Agency is ill equipped to reach a rational conclusion on this election event.

That incompetence is the reason why President Bush ignored CIA briefings and reports and
established a cut out group for collection of information.  Cut-Outs (pop outs) were more reliable. Cut outs were not in the position like Agency analysts of having to fabricate stories and scenarios, because they were being paid to produce something.

This CIA spin and Russian Putin involvement is all wrong.

Russia would be in good stead to assist in this investigation.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Note:  This article will be updated periodically.  Check back.

(c)oliver2016

FREE BRINK'S PREPAID MASTERCARD

FREE-BRINK'S Prepaid MasterCard!
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Deposit $40.00          RECEIVE $20. Cash deposit BONUS 

Apply Now: BRINK'S PREPAID MASTERCARD

No credit check.            FDIC Insured
Netspend Corporation      Mastercard

COMPUTER HACKING: Did Foreign Intervention Install a US Government?

COMPUTER HACKING:  Did Foreign Intervention Install a US Government?

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

By: Ray Oliver New York Metropolitan Area-OliverNewMedia



NPR NEWS ANNOUNCED on November 28th that, computer experts at the University of Michigan have informed the California Election Board that voter returns could have been hacked.  This announcement is welcoming news for different reasons.

First, Michigan is the first public announcement, following my earlier articles, that there might be a connection between the earlier "scanning and probing" cyber attack and a potential cyber attack on our election’s computer voter returns.  The New York Times earlier reported that a cyber attack
NYT cyber attack  was conducted by a foreign government.  The foreign government attacked by “scanning and probing state voter registration rolls,” across the United States prior to the election.   The director of the National Security Agency refused to attribute the attack to the Russian government.  A different government used a Russian company to scan and probe state voter registration rolls across the US prior to the national election.

Secondly, having selected the University of Michigan at Ann Arbor, for the computational analysis was the perfect selection. It is encouraging that some had the intelligence to know where to go for this serious national issue.

There is no better place than Michigan at Ann Arbor to solve this election mystery.
Why is Michigan the perfect place?

The most active and advanced mathematical Supercomputing center is located at the University of Illinois at the Circle Campus.

"Circle" has a longstanding association with our intelligence agencies.  In addition, the university is under significant influence by that foreign government, which will rise to the top of the suspect list for hacking US computer voter returns, if evidence of computer hacking emerges.

That suspected foreign government has influence in the appointment and termination of professors on the Circle campus.  There is a history of that government, acting through local political and religious groups, of creating blacklists on academicians, who are critical of that government and their policies.
Who knows?  We may even discover that the Circle Campus Supercomputer was used in a (potential) cyber attack and distortion of our national election.  Of course, my statement here is speculation.  To use the Circle Campus supercomputing capabilities would require an obliteration of all signatures that the origin of the attack was connected to the CC computer.

This makes use of the Illini Circle supercomputing mathematical center, highly unlikely and improbable.

Michigan at Ann Arbor is the perfect choice, because Michigan's experts are not affected by that potential Circle Campus contamination.

There is another player to watch out for in future developments on the computational analysis playing field of voter returns.

Watch to see if University of Indiana becomes a player in these voter recounts.
Why watch Indiana University?

IU is one of the portals into our intelligence agencies.

Connections are made early at IU for introduction into the Agency (CIA).  Sometimes, these introductions come from University of Illinois at Circle and transfer to IU for further development and assimilation into the intelligence community.

When these voter recounts begin, with the participation of great computational analysts like Michigan at Ann Arbor, we can look forward to a "rockem-sockem" fight on what happened on November 8th.
There is even a potential for an unprecedented constitutional crisis on the legality of an incumbent president, if Swing State votes were distorted.   Additionally, there may be an earth-shaking revelation on just how fool-hearted America has been in its trust of a recidivist hostile agent country, pretending to be our friend.

After all, it was not too long ago that their espionage agent was sentenced to the longest prison term in US modern history, for causing, according to the US Department of Justice and the federal sentencing Judge, "the greatest damage to US national security in history."  This unprecedented foreign government damage to America followed that government's hijacking of a tractor-trailer along Route 80 in Pennsylvania, which carried weapons grade Plutonium.  It is this same foreign government, which smuggled the contraband Plutonium out of the US, callously endangering the lives of millions of Americans along the eastern seaboard.  This rogue government used the US stolen Plutonium to launch an illegal and clandestine nuclear weapons program, manufacturing more than 250 nuclear warheads over the past forty years.

This same government emotionally entrapped a US senior engineer who worked for one of the country's largest chemical companies.  They emotionally forced him to participate in their military top-secret program on Smoke.  It is a recidivist hostile country agent that "handled" their young married, US visiting Research Scientist, to steal academic research information and technology on Ceramics, from a large eastern state university.

It is the same hostile agent country, who during the Nixon administration, continuously stole copies of legislative materials transported for publication, where those materials could not make it across the street from the US Capitol Building to the Government Printing Office, without their embassy in the District secreting copies first.

The list is long.

Flipping a few US computer voter return digits to install a US government that earlier promised to give them their self-perceived Holy Grail, would be no problem for a government with this history.

Are memories so short-lived?

(c)oliver2016
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

NATURAL LAW AND THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE

NATURAL LAW AND THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

LET ME ANSWER (again) a question that some have asked me regarding the Electoral College.

Briefly:
The Electoral College was created out of the philosophy studied by the Founding Fathers and their strong belief in the Natural Law.

The Natural Law is the law of morality and ethics. Its most fundamental expression of principle is that "All men ought to act according to their true conscience." This is the philosophy of St. Thomas Aquinas in his work, Summa Theologica and earlier expressed by Plato in his works on "Metaphysics." The term Meta means "beyond." The term Physics means "the physical world."

Metaphysics is the study beyond the physical world that we live in.

The Founding Fathers believed that an essential function of a democracy is to express the will of an "informed" majority in the interest of the Public Good.

The Founding Fathers foresaw that their might arise a situation where the will of the majority contravenes the public good or may be an expression of an act against Ethics.

An example might be where the majority (plurality) of voters have voted to abolish their democracy and vote in a tyrannical government.

To address that potential dysfunction of a democracy, the Founding Fathers created an Electoral College that casts the votes to elect the President and Vice President.

Members of the Electoral College are equal in number to each state's members of the House of Representatives and their two Senators.

It is tradition for them to cast their votes for the winner of the plurality of votes in their states.

HOWEVER, as instilled by the Founding Fathers, these members of the Electoral College are NOT mandated to cast their votes for the majority winner of their state.  Some states have enacted party rules or state statutes which attempt to mandate loyal voting or disqualify disloyal voting.  These statutes or rules are of no consequence when contemplating the historical backdrop to the formation of the Electoral College and their ethical duty to act according to true conscience. 

The members of the Electoral College are dictated by their conscience to cast their votes on behalf of their state's constituency.

IF A MEMBER of the Electoral College's true conscience does not allow them to cast their vote for the majority winner of their state, then they OUGHT to act only according to their true conscience and cast their vote accordingly.

THEREFORE, a member of the Electoral College is NOT obligated to cast their votes, except according to their true conscience.

Theoretically, the members of the Electoral College may cast their votes for Hillary Clinton or even for a third party candidate, without regard to the majority vote winner in their state.

Whether these electoral college members will cast their votes for a candidate other than their state's winning candidate is extremely unlikely. The members will vote for their state's winner, unless a catastrophic event occurs which allows them to be guided by their conscience when casting their votes.

There is no chance of the electoral college viewing the election of Donald Trump as a conscience shaking event. There is no chance that Hillary Clinton will be given the electoral votes from the states where she lost the plurality of the votes.

The Natural Law, which supercedes any conventional laws made by man, does not apply to or favor Hillary Clinton when the Electoral College casts their votes.
(c)oliver2016
-----------------------------
UPDATED: See comment below in answer to point raised on Trump's "fitness to serve."

*** [ An unfit person, is only one potential event, which can lead the EC to elect a candidate, other than the plurality winner of their state.

As I explained above, the EC is based on Natural Law principles studied by Thomas Jefferson and others. (Because we were only permitted to study primary sources, I was required to read the same original, rare text book on Natural and Politic Law, by J.J. Burlamaqui, that Jefferson studied from, in addition to studying the Letters of Thomas Jefferson.)

Any time a member of EC votes, they are duty-bound to vote their true conscience. The reality is that the EC will cast their votes for the plurality winner of their state. There is nothing in this past election that would change the minds of enough EC college members to vote otherwise. ...

BUT, a person  raised a valid point.
The  issue of whether Trump is the type of candidate that should not receive the EC vote, is problematic.

In Ethics, Trump could be deemed to be unfit to serve as president. The statement of Pope Francis that Trump "lacks the moral qualifications to lead a country," raises an ethical dilemma for the EC. Although Ethics does not arise from religious principles, the Pope clearly is an authority on ethics and morality.

In Ethics, the Pope's assessment of Trump is conclusive in recognizing that ethics dictates that  in order to act morally, "one ought not to vote for Trump." This moral dictate applies to the members of the electoral college.

Therefore, it is correct, that in Ethics, members of the EC "ought" not to vote for Trump, in order to act morally.]
(c)oliver2016
-----------------:
Note: For further study, SEE: Fagothy, Austin. "Right & Reason."
Austin Fagothy was a modern day, world-renowned philosopher who taught at the University of Santa Clara. Prof. Fagothy's text is highly recommended. It is a concise statement of argument of the pros and cons on major ethical issues, written with incomparable clarity

FOREIGN GOVERNMENT "SCANNING AND PROBING" OF US ELECTION ROLLS

FOREIGN "SCANNING AND PROBING" OF US ELECTION ROLLS
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
THIS IS THE signal. There may be a clue here to the surprising results of the election. The results contradict the empirical data and computer calculated prediction. Having had a personal experience around 1994 at a remote, isolated lake near the border of Rhode Island and Connecticut, I have this continuing sense of suspicion, which I cannot shake off. My Washington Bureau Chief friend's advice to me when I was in the District, still rings in my head, "Mr. Ray. You have to be careful in this world. Everything is possible. Nothing is too crazy."

Let's assume as a hypothetical that there was foreign interference with the reporting of numbers or computer programming in this election.

There are only two foreign countries that have motive and opportunity to interfere with election results and reporting false numbers. One is Russia. The other is not China, but maybe as Donald Trump said when he dismissed Obama's accusation of Russia, that it could be
“somebody sitting on their (China's) bed that weighs 400 pounds.” (Source: New York Times Oct. 7, 2016)

Here is an excerpt of the New York Times, Oct. 7, 2016 article.

   

"The statement from Mr. Clapper and the Department of Homeland Security, which is primarily responsible for defending the country against sophisticated cyberattacks, said the intelligence agencies were less certain who was responsible for “scanning and probing” online election rolls in states around the country. It said that those “in most cases originated from servers operated by a Russian company,” but stopped short of alleging the Russian government was responsible for those probes.

...

as recently as Wednesday the director of the National Security Agency, Adm. Michael Rogers, refused to publicly accuse Moscow."  NYT Oct. 7, 2016

There is a clue here. I cannot shake off my suspicion. There is one country that has absolutely no reservation in acting against the US on "every level," in doing whatever it deems in its own best interest.

I will look further into this. As I mentioned earlier, there are people in NY's Diamond District who can provide reliable and credible information relating to US-Russia events. During the 1980s, there was a direct link on Canal Street, New York. That link no longer exists. In the early 1980s, I was told by a client that while he was in a foreign country, he was instructed by his business negotiators, "not to take that flight out of the country." He changed his flight ticket. That flight was carrying government officials and crashed.

The point is that there are highly credible sources which can lend insight into what happened with our election model. Why was every analytical calculation wrong?

The answer to the election result mystery lies somewhere. That place might be found in the operations center of a foreign intelligence organization that interfered with our elections to snatch their Holy Grail. Edited 11/10/16
(c)oliver2016
---------------------------
RAY OLIVER
to reach the author call or text 862.276.1505

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quoted source: http://www.nytimes.com/…/us-formally-accuses-russia-of-stea…

FOREIGN GOVERNMENT "SCANNING AND PROBING" OF US ELECTION ROLLS

FOREIGN "SCANNING AND PROBING" OF US ELECTION ROLLS
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
THIS IS THE signal. There may be a clue here to the surprising results of the election. The results contradict the empirical data and computer calculated prediction. Having had a personal experience around 1994 at a remote, isolated lake near the border of Rhode Island and Connecticut, I have this continuing sense of suspicion, which I cannot shake off. My Washington Bureau Chief friend's advice to me when I was in the District, still rings in my head, "Mr. Ray. You have to be careful in this world. Everything is possible. Nothing is too crazy."

Let's assume as a hypothetical that there was foreign interference with the reporting of numbers or computer programming in this election.

There are only two foreign countries that have motive and opportunity to interfere with election results and reporting false numbers. One is Russia. The other is not China, but maybe as Donald Trump said when he dismissed Obama's accusation of Russia, that it could be
“somebody sitting on their (China's) bed that weighs 400 pounds.” (Source: New York Times Oct. 7, 2016)

Here is an excerpt of the New York Times, Oct. 7, 2016 article.
"The statement from Mr. Clapper and the Department of Homeland Security, which is primarily responsible for defending the country against sophisticated cyberattacks, said the intelligence agencies were less certain who was responsible for “scanning and probing” online election rolls in states around the country. It said that those “in most cases originated from servers operated by a Russian company,” but stopped short of alleging the Russian government was responsible for those probes.
...
as recently as Wednesday the director of the National Security Agency, Adm. Michael Rogers, refused to publicly accuse Moscow."  NYT Oct. 7, 2016


There is a clue here. I cannot shake off my suspicion. There is one country that has absolutely no reservation in acting against the US on "every level," in doing whatever it deems in its own best interest.

I will look further into this. As I mentioned earlier, there are people in NY's Diamond District who can provide reliable and credible information relating to US-Russia events. During the 1980s, there was a direct link on Canal Street, New York. That link no longer exists. In the early 1980s, I was told by a client that while he was in a foreign country, he was instructed by his business negotiators, "not to take that flight out of the country." He changed his flight ticket. That flight was carrying government officials and crashed.

The point is that there are highly credible sources which can lend insight into what happened with our election model. Why was every analytical calculation wrong?

The answer to the election result mystery lies somewhere. That place might be found in the operations center of a foreign intelligence organization that interfered with our elections to snatch their Holy Grail. Edited 11/10/16
(c)oliver2016
---------------------------
RAY OLIVER
call or text 862.276.1505

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quoted source: http://www.nytimes.com/…/us-formally-accuses-russia-of-stea…

ISRAEL ULTRA CONSERVATIVE GOVERNMENT ELATED OVER TRUMP ELECTION ANNOUNCES END OF PALESTINE
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IN ISRAEL, NETANYAHU congratulated newly elected president Donald Trump, stating that Israel has a "shared destiny" with America. President-elect Donald Trump invited Netanyahu to meet with him as soon as the Israeli Prime Minister can arrange his travels.

In the face of criticism for earlier statements by Netanyahu which were interpreted by world leaders to be a willful disregard of international law and UN resolutions, Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu had refrained from making further controversial statements in his congratulatory statements on the election of President-elect Donald Trump.

Netanyahu's restraint however, was not reflected by the rest of his ultra conservative cabinet members. Netanyahu's ultra conservative members shouted to Israel's press, that Trump's election marks "the end of the two State solution" and is "an end to the existence of Palestine."

Netanyahu's ultra conservative appointments called for an "immediate move of the US Embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem" in a symbolic message that Israel has annexed Jerusalem from Palestine.
Currently, no country in the world has located their Embassy in Jerusalem. No country currently recognizes Israel's claim of Jerusalem as its capital, based on the recognized legal status of East Jerusalem under international law.

The United States consistently, from Republican through Democratic Presidents, has refused to locate the US Embassy to Jerusalem. Netanyahu among other top cabinet officials have called for the US Embassy to be moved quickly to Jerusalem.

It was earlier reported, that Donald Trump earlier made a personal promise to Netanyahu to move the US Embassy to Jerusalem.
Trump's promise goes against long-standing policy of the US and against UN resolutions and world-wide recognized international law.

The Israeli Occupation of East (Old) Jerusalem is construed by the United Nations as a violation of international law and in violation of long standing UN Resolutions. These include the same resolutions which had created the state of Israel.

Under the "1947 UN Partition Plan for Palestine," the United Nations partitioned off 78% of Palestine and gave those defined boundaries to the Zionist Party for creation of a separate Jewish state in Palestine.

Under the terms of the 1947 UN Partition Plan, Israel was given West (new) Jerusalem, while East Jerusalem remained within the original country of Palestine. Israel militarily occupied East Jerusalem during the 1967 Arab-Israeli War.

The UN has reaffirmed Israel's illegal occupation of East Jerusalem through UN Resolution 242 and subsequent resolutions which call for Israel's withdrawal to boundaries defined prior to the 1967 Arab-Israeli War. International law experts note that no country is permitted to acquire lands through annexation of another country or region.

The UN Charter, the Law of War on Land (1907), numerous UN Resolutions and post Napoleonic Custom and Protocol under International Law, prohibits any country from "Acquisition by Annexation" of lands.

Many newspaper references to the status of Jerusalem inaccurately portray the issue of Israel Occupation of Jerusalem as a competition by both Palestinians and Israelis for East Jerusalem to be their capital.

Despite that portrayal, according to the United Nations and world community, the current legal status of East Jerusalem is that it was never a portion of the lands partitioned by the UN and given to Israel.
UN spokespersons, including the UN Secretary General have noted that East Jerusalem historically remains within the original country of Palestine under the UN Partition Plan and under International Law.

President-elect Trump is poised to disregard the world community and international law by acting on reported favors requested by Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu, relating to the US Embassy and Occupation of East Jerusalem and eliminating the State of Palestine.

On the election of Trump, President Abbas of Palestine congratulated President-elect Donald Trump and promised to work towards peace in accordance with UN Resolutions and under International Law governing the status of East Jerusalem.
(c)oliver2016
-------------
RAY OLIVER

NATURAL LAW AND THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE IN THE US

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LET ME ANSWER (again) a question that some have asked me regarding the Electoral College.

Briefly:
The Electoral College was created out of the philosophy studied by the Founding Fathers and their strong belief in the Natural Law.

The Natural Law is the law of morality and ethics. Its most fundamental expression of principle is that "All men ought to act according to their true conscience." This is the philosophy of St. Thomas Aquinas in his work, Summa Theologica and earlier expressed by Plato in his works on "Metaphysics." The term Meta means "beyond." The term Physics means "the physical world."
Metaphysics is the study beyond the physical world that we live in.

The Founding Fathers believed that an essential function of a democracy is to express the will of an "informed" majority in the interest of the Public Good.
The Founding Fathers foresaw that their might arise a situation where the will of the majority contravenes the public good or may be an expression of an act against Ethics.
An example might be where the majority (plurality) of voters have voted to abolish their democracy and vote in a tyrannical government.

To address that potential dysfunction of a democracy, the Founding Fathers created an Electoral College that casts the votes to elect the President and Vice President.
Members of the Electoral College are each state's members of the House of Representatives and their two Senators.

It is tradition for them to cast their votes for the winner of the plurality of votes in their states.

HOWEVER, as instilled by the Founding Fathers, these members of the Electoral College are NOT mandated to cast their votes for the majority winner of their state.

The members of the Electoral College are dictated by their conscience to cast their votes on behalf of their state's constituency.

IF A MEMBER of the Electoral College's true conscience does not allow them to cast their vote for the majority winner of their state, then they OUGHT to act only according to their true conscience and cast their vote accordingly.

THEREFORE, a member of the Electoral College is NOT obligated to cast their votes, except according to their "true conscience."

Theoretically, the members of the Electoral College may cast their votes for Hillary Clinton or even for a third party candidate, without regard to the majority vote winner in their state.
Whether these electoral college members will cast their votes for a candidate other than their state's winning candidate is extremely unlikely. The members will vote for their state's winner, unless a catastrophic event occurs which allows them to be guided by their conscience when casting their votes.

There is no chance of the electoral college viewing the election of Donald Trump as a conscience shaking event. There is no chance that Hillary Clinton will be given the electoral votes from the states where she lost the plurality of the votes.

The Natural Law, which supercedes any laws made by man, does not apply to or favor Hillary Clinton when the Electoral College casts their votes.
(c)oliver2016
---------------
RAY OLIVER
contact info at 862.276.1505

WHY ARE THERE PROTESTS ACROSS THE COUNTRY AGAINST DONALD TRUMP?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Because, Trump told America that women and girls are worthless and free to physically, sexually abuse when you "are a star."

And a large portion of the United States electorate agreed

Because, Trump told America and disabled people that children and adults with Cerebral Palsy act funny, "like this, (parodies acts)."
And a large portion of the United States electorate agreed.

Because, Trump displayed his pretentiously named son, Baron, in front of America and told a mother that her infant son, will never achieve higher success or professional esteem than being a "future construction worker."
And a large portion of the United States electorate agreed.

Because, Trump told America that it is "okay to target specific religious groups," despite the principles of the Founding Fathers guaranteeing a Freedom of Religion in America.
And a large portion of the United States electorate agreed.

But, a larger portion of America, representing a majority of the electorate have disagreed.

-----------

Ray Oliver 

Nov. 12, 2016